Senator Bob Casey Wary on Trans-Pacific Partnership: “Previous trade agreements have failed to produce tangible benefits for everyday Americans”

Last week, I emailed Pat Toomey, Bob Casey and Allyson Schwartz  telling them to back down from the Trans-Pacific Partnership – a trade agreement that makes the North American Free Trade Agreement that looks like Barry Bonds, pre-steroids.  Last night, I was able to get a response from Senator Bob Casey on the issue, and to my surprise, it appears that Senator Casey may be in the senate minority, when it comes to supporting the issue.  Here’s what he – or one of his staffers – had to say:

Thank you for taking the time to contact me with your thoughts on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). I appreciate hearing from you about this issue.
Since 2009, the United States has been in negotiations to participate in the TPP, a free trade agreement with countries in the Asia-Pacific region, which comprises over 40 percent of global trade. The U.S. is negotiating with 11 countries regarding the potential agreement: Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. These negotiations are now entering their final stages.
As a member of the Committee on Finance, I will be actively involved in reviewing potential legislation implementing the TPP and any other future free trade agreements.  I have serious concerns about the TPP agreement. The agreement has not yet been finalized and I have written to President Obama on a number of occasions to express my reservations with the negotiations thus far. Previous trade agreements have failed to produce tangible benefits for everyday Americans.  Instead of creating opportunities, our trade policy has too often done little more than off-shore good-paying jobs, while giving our trading partners unlimited access to our market.
Going forward, we must pursue a trade policy that rejuvenates Pennsylvania’s manufacturing base, creating jobs and a stronger middle class. As trade agreements, Trade Promotion Authority and other legislation that affect U.S. trade policy come before the Senate, you can be assured that my priority will be protecting and creating American jobs.
Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future about this or any other matter of importance to you.
For more information on this or other issues, I encourage you to visit my website,  I hope you will find this online office a comprehensive resource to stay up-to-date on my work in Washington, request assistance from my office, or share with me your thoughts on the issues that matter most to you and to Pennsylvania.  (emphasis added)
So there you have it.  Senator Bob Casey’s office is on the record claiming that he has serious concerns about the TPP, and that previous trade agreements aren’t beneficial to the United States.


Liked it? Take a second to support us on Patreon!
About Sean Kitchen 681 Articles
Contributor and Assistant Editor for the Raging Chicken Press. Stationed in Harrisburg covering politics in the capitol. You can send tips to or reach me on twitter at @RCPress_Sean!
Contact: Twitter

1 Comment on Senator Bob Casey Wary on Trans-Pacific Partnership: “Previous trade agreements have failed to produce tangible benefits for everyday Americans”

  1. My understanding of the TPP is not only trade but lack of regulations for Corporations so as to have their way. I believe their rules would over rule our constitution, workers rights, environmental regulations as many corporations are run by malevolents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.