Pennsylvania Catholic Conference Losing Minds Over Gay Marriage Ruling

Update: And then Philadelphia Archbishop Chaput weighed in

Today’s federal district court decision striking down Pennsylvania’s Defense of Marriage Act is a mistake with long-term, negative consequences. Like many other Pennsylvanians, I hope that an appeal will be made promptly. Laws that defend the traditional definition of marriage were enacted for sound reasons-namely to defend the rights of children and contribute to the well-being of the larger community.

Marriage is more than a private arrangement between two people. It’s a public commitment of love and fidelity, and it’s ordered not just to companionship but to creating and rearing new life. This is why every child deserves a mother and a father in a loving marriage, and the child is the fruit of that love.

All men and women are formed in the image of God and deserve our respect. But attempts to redefine the nature of marriage, no matter how well intentioned, damage a cornerstone of our human interaction and ultimately work against human dignity itself.

I also fully support and endorse the statement issued earlier today by the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference on this issue. You can read the full text of that document here http://www.pacatholic.org/statement-todays-marriage-ruling/.

You knew this was coming.  It was just a matter of who spoke out first.

“Today’s decision by one federal judge speaks to the confusion and misunderstanding among many today about the fundamental building block of society: the family.  Every child has a basic right to a mother and a father united in marriage as a family. Today’s decision does not change that,” conference officials issued in a written statement.

In the statement, Amy Hill, a spokeswoman for the Catholic Conference, wrote that while marriage was a personal relationship, it was not merely a private affair, but one that carried great public significance and impacted the family and society.

“By God’s design, every child has a mother and a father,” Hill wrote. “Circumstances may prevent a child from being raised by his or her own mother and father, so we stand in solidarity with single mothers and fathers who work responsibly each day to raise their children. However, marriage is the way society provides for children’s needs. The redefinition of marriage enshrines in law a denial of the rights of children to a mother and a father united in marriage.”

“No one should face unjust discrimination,” she wrote. “But human experience, considerable social data, as well as our religious convictions, lead us to see clearly that children thrive best in a stable family grounded on the marital union of one man and one woman. Catholic opposition to same-sex marriage is not a statement about the worth of human beings who experience same-sex attraction, but a statement about the nature of marriage itself.”

 

About Sean Kitchen 584 Articles
Assistant Editor of the Raging Chicken Press and living in Harrisburg pursuing journalistic opportunities. You can send tips to SeanKitchen@RagingChickenPress.org and reach me on twitter at @RCPress_Sean!
Contact: Twitter

2 Comments on Pennsylvania Catholic Conference Losing Minds Over Gay Marriage Ruling

  1. Oh, please. Give it a rest will you? Your religious beliefs are not valid reasons or a good foundation for the laws of this nation; no matter what you may think to be good and proper. In the first place, we don’t even live in a christian nation. We live in a SECULAR constitutional republic, not a theocracy. We also have a legal doctrine of separation of church and state. Especially from the catholic church, given its long history of tyrannical abuse of any secular power it has ever managed to gain.

    The catholic church has no credibility when it calls for the protection of children, given the churches history of child abuse and the long running, monumental efforts to cover up that abuse by the hierarchy of said church. Talking about hypocrisy. Neither does the church have any wiggle room when it speaks to the sanctity of the family, given its same history. The church can’t even lay claim to the desire to protect women, given its one time secret creation of Magdalene Laundries in Ireland.

    While the church may have a right to teach as it will. And its followers may believe whatever they like. The church has absolutely no right at all to even try and influence the wording of any law at any level in this nation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*